To better understand this comment, I would refer you to the excellent post by Scott Eric Alt on Interacting With the Spaemann Interview on Amoris Laetitia ,
Now my two cents.
I’m having a problem with the Professor Spaemann’s answers and those of others of the same way of thinking. It is not impossible for anyone to disagree with something in an Apostolic Exhortation. This much is true. They are written to offer some guidance, not to teach. One can always disagree with the guidance that is offered. Before I continue, allow me to say that we can and often do teach through the guidance that we offer. Anyone who’s a parent knows exactly what I mean, but back to the professor.
I never trust these reports. It is often the case that the gaps between what the subject said and the reporter wrote are as numerous as the craters on the moon. For the sake of this discussion, let’s give the interviewer the benefit of the doubt and accept that he is reporting without too much editing.
It is my opinion that the Professor’s responses are not helpful on two fronts.
First: They present a dark side of the exhortation, but the speaker fails to give you observable results from past experiences that prove the existence of such a dark side. Philosophy works with and based on systems. I could not find that system that the professor uses to arrive at his conclusions. Therefore, I can only assume that the systems are not reported, which does not allow those of us who know some philosophy to question the methodology leading to his conclusions. The other possibility is that he is not using systematic thinking, but it projecting his predictions based on subjectivity (gut feeling).
Second: I caution people to be careful with those who claim to love the Church and to have been a consultant to this pope and a friend to that one. This can be and probably is true. Sometimes, these relationships can obscure one’s sense of duty. Even though the Professor was an advisor to St. John Paul II and a friend to Benedict XVI, as a faithful Catholic philosopher, his first allegiance is to the Church, not the individual popes. Therefore, I would expect him to use his skills and his intimate experience with these two giants to help his audience see the points of contact and continuity between AL and tradition. In no way does this detract from his right to use his intellect to say, “This can be said more clearly,” or “This raises this question that we need to submit to someone in authority to respond.”
In doing so, one is faithful to the Church, does not throw the current pope under the bus, is not sucked into the typical Church politics of “conservative vs liberals”, and helps people see the good in the exhortation while encouraging them to ask questions respectfully and with trust in the integrity of the person answering.