I attended mass this Sunday at my favorite parish. The homilist is one of my favorite priests. His message is always very good and very orthodox. So why am I writing this blog entrance? Two important things happened. I’ll begin with the least positive and conclude with the more positive event.
Father tends to repeat himself a great deal during his homilies, which makes them very long. Something has not set well with me about these long homilies and I think I figured out what it is. They unbalance the liturgy.
One of the major concerns when in the liturgical renewal was to give a more prominent place to the Word of God. The idea of a Liturgy of the Word with three readings and a psalm was born. But the theology of the mass was not supposed to change. The mass is still the unbloody sacrifice of Calvary. The sacrifice must still occupy pride and place during the mass.
However, when your homily is three times longer than the Eucharistic Prayer, when you have the laity reading aloud from their bibles during the homily, the preacher is everywhere but at the pulpit and the style of the homily resembles a Protestant revival more than a Catholic homily, with people calling out, clapping, cheering and more, then there is a problem. The problem is that the sacrifice is virtually ignored. People attend the mass because they love Father N’s homilies. But Fathehr N’s homilies are an event unto themselves that make the Liturgy of the Eucharist pale by comparison.
Another problem enters the picture when Father N repeatedly makes certain comments. Every preacher has a pet phrase, slogan or idiomatic expression that he will throw in there with some frequency. We have to make room for the human element. A preacher is a human being who comes with his culture, his persona and his style. We can’t and shouldn’t expect them all to be cut out of the same bolt of cloth. Even identical twins have different personalities, why should all preachers have the same personality?
Having said this, it is important that the preacher beware when his homilies are attracting more attention to him than to God. This is important, because it’s very easy to upstage God, if the preacher is not careful. People can see the preacher, but they can’t see God. Expressions such as:
Never say no to Father.
I’m a priest.
I’ve been a priest for X number of years.
I’m a priest and he’s only a deacon.
When I walk down the street . . . .
Don’t let any priest tell you differently and if he does, send him to me.
Such expressions can be dangerous. They become more dangerous when the preacher does not realize that they are calling too much attention to him, making it the Liturgy of HIS word instead of the Liturgy of the Word.
Some people would say that this is a weakness of the revised order of the mass and that going back to the Tridentine form would resolve all of this. This is not true. These issues have nothing to do with the form. They are about preachers failing to execute the Liturgy of the Word as Pope Paul VI intended it to be when he revised the missal.
Preachers must also be sensitive to the possibility of using the congregation instead of proclaiming the Word of God to the faithful. If the congregation is hanging on to your every word, clapping, calling out during your homily, and cheering you on and if this is usual for your homilies, there is a danger here. The preacher is risking using the congregation to feed his ego.
The sad part here is that these are good priests and deacons. They don’t have any intention of doing harm, violating the rubrics, attracting attention, or turning the church into a revival tent. Their intention is to preach a message to the people of God. When the preacher hijacks his own homily, it’s a sad day. This can easily happen when Father or Deacon plan their homilies around the message they want to deliver and include themselves too much in the homily. They fail to factor in how to use that message to help people move from the table of the Word to the altar of sacrifice.
Human beings need help transitioning from one event to another. We also need to start looking at the mass as the prayer of the Church, not Father X’s mass that we never miss. “Because Father is a great preacher,” or this is the mass that one tries to avoid, “Because it’s Father X’s mass and I don’t like it. If that’s the only mass left, then I won’t go to any mass this Sunday.” These are not viable and acceptable reactions to a mass. However, these are real dangers when people make it Father X’s mass and Father X encourages it with his behavior and his language. For months I’ve been uncomfortable with this situation, thinking to myself that something bothered me when Father N celebrates the mass.
I did say that two things happened and that the second was very positive for me. I was angry when I arrived at home. I left the mass angry. Suddenly, one of our new aspirants tells me that he plans on visiting with me next week. I respond that I hope that I’m in a better mood and proceed to tell him how angry I was at this priest. He reminded me that I had taught him to focus on the parts of the mass, not this person or the next one. We don’t go to to mass to police the liturgy.
The fact is that I did teach him this. You never know for whom you work. I have been teaching all of our men in formation that they attend holy mass to worship God, not to pay attention to what others are saying or doing. “Just turn them off your impatience and your pride.”
Hearing these things from the aspirant helped me to realize that I was playing liturgical police rather than praying the liturgy. In his own mild way, Brother put me back in my place using my words. It’s good to have brothers to humble you whenever you need to be knocked down a peg or two.

e white garment reminds us that we must be like Mary who practiced what the Lord revealed to her with great purity of heart. There was no agenda, no selfishness, no resentment, and no search for control, profit or pleasure in Our Lady. There was only one thought, to fulfill what God had asked of her. This is true purity. It goes beyond physical chastity. One can abstain from sins of the flesh, but easily fall into other sins that are equally damning. The shirt is worn over grey slacks and finally a Tau pendant must be worn by the brother postulant. We will address the grey further down.

rs for the Franciscans of Life, we went back to early Franciscan tradition. We found that Clare and Francis were practical. Not only did they try to make use of whatever wool was the cheapest, but they were also very conscientious about working conditions. Although the brothers are men of penance, this does not mean that we be unreasonable. Penance does not have to be a torture in order to please God. Francis and Clare gave us an example of dress that set them apart as poor and part of a family. The tunic and cord were the constant. Today, the Tau is the constant. When two or more brothers walk into a setting, people should be able say, ‘Here comes the Church.”





mission that held
“Behold, I am with you and will keep you wherever you go, and will bring you back to this land; for I will not leave you until I have done that of which I have spoken to you” (Gen 28:15).



that grandparent that is no longer physically attractive and at times can be cranky. Just like Grandma’, she is beautiful inside and has much wisdom to pass on to us, if we open ourselves to receive it. Francis loves the Church, warts and all. He takes his sons and daughters into the heart of the Church, through example more than words. He teaches us to look beyond the surface and see the glory of the Church.
. There were also brothers who fought his vision of the Gospel Life tooth and nail, to the point of being mean. But like all good little brothers, Francis loved them just the same. Little brothers can often become the most forgiving persons. Francis was the brother who always forgave.
That’s why he wrote the admonitions. Why admonish those who need no admonishing? However, when one reads through the admonitions, his letters, his rules and his testament, he does not refer to a single person as a sinner, other than himself. He leaves that to God. In other words, St. Francis is a person who can teach us what belongs to God, what belongs to the Church, to the superior and to the individual. He does not cross those boundaries.





3.